|

Recommended Books
Books by
Steven Lambert






|
The Purview of Apostolic
Authority ©
By Steven Lambert, ThD
Editorial Note:
Recently I received an email from a subscriber who was asking me for answers to
some questions he had concerning some troubling issues related to the nascent
apostolic renewal. It was not until I was finishing the last paragraph of my
response that I heard the Spirit tell me that I needed to post my answer to the
SLM website, because it would also help others who have had similar thoughts and
questions. Just bear in mind as you read my response, that this is not intended
to be a theological treatise or comprehensive exposition on the matter of the
apostolic or even this aspect of it, but rather I offer it to you as just one
tiny little patch of the quilt the Spirit is weaving on the matter at this time
in the Church..."line upon line, precept upon precept, a little here, a little
there."
Question:
I hear a lot concerning "apostolic authority." What does apostolic
authority mean? I have known apostles who march into churches and tell the
pastor he has to submit to them because of apostolic authority or they will ask
the pastor, who is your apostle? Does the apostle have authority over the pastor
in the local church? Help!!
Reply:
I will try to give you a relatively succinct answer to a rather complex
matter, without fleshing it out much. I will answer the first question in what
follows. The last question, which is the essence of what you are asking, I will
answer directly first: No, an apostle does not have authority over the leadership
of local churches of which he is not a part and is not esteemed as the "set man"
of that assembly merely by virtue of some perceived "authority" inherent in the
title of "Apostle." Indeed, a true God-anointed, God-appointed, Spirit-trained
apostle would never even THINK of such a thing.
Unfortunately, the kind of attitudes you describe represent what
"Apostolic Authority" means to many misinformed and misguided people.
A major problem in dealing with the matter of local church government, on the
backdrop of the renewed awareness concerning Fivefold Ministry and the
restoration of the Apostolic and Prophetic offices, in particular, is that while
they are related, they are not the same, and the terminology we have been using
regarding ministry offices or positions in the church has been contrary to
Scripture.
Namely, in the last hundred years or so, predominantly, the Church has been
using the term "Pastor" to refer to the chief or top leader in the
local church, despite the fact that government, i.e., "ruling," is not
included in the office of the pastor, per se, as delineated in Scripture. The
Bible is clear that "elders...rule" (1 Tim. 5:17, et al.).
The local church is to be governed by a presbytery of elders (plural). However, here
again most local churches have had that wrong as well, as to who elders are,
especially denominational churches. According to the preponderance of Scripture, the
eldership of a local church should be comprised of those who God has appointed to
Fivefold Ministry Offices (Eph. 4:11), which appointment is attested by the anointing
(spiritual gifting) inherent in those offices. And, among the Fivefold Ministry Office,
those functioning in the apostolic, prophetic, and teaching should be regarded as
preeminent in the government of the church (1 Cor. 12:28).
This picture becomes clear when the entire mosaic of Scripture is put
together rightly ("rightly dividing the Word of Truth" [2 Tim. 2:15]), which is
too complex and expansive of a matter for us to deal with here, but I will offer the
following. Jesus chose Twelve of His disciples, and appointed (named) them "Apostles"
(Mat. 10:1-5). These Apostles of the Lamb were His chief delegates, surrogates, or
representatives in the Early Church following Jesus' ascension. This set the precedent
of Apostolic Appointment.
Additionally, 1 Cor. 12:28 clearly states the order of preeminence
of ministerial authority and government in the local church: "And God as set in
the CHURCH, FIRST Apostles, SECOND Prophets, THIRD teachers...." Notice that
the pastoral office is not mentioned in this verse, per se. In fact the word
"pastor" (poimen) only occurs once in the entire N.T., which is in Ephesians
4:11. So, using Scripture as the sole precedent and paradigm (and this order is clearly
further corroborated throughout the N.T.), the office of apostle is unequivocally the
preeminent ministry office, functionally speaking, with prophets and teachers
respectively following next in succession. The Greek word in this verse translated
"first" is the word "proton," which connotes, first in time, first in order, first
in rank, first in function, first in priority. (Now, while I fully realize that such
teaching is controversial to those unfamiliar with it, exegetical development of
these concepts is simply beyond the parameters of this article. Though, they are
developed in several of my books and will be addressed further in forthcoming books.)
Now, the problem is, since the church fell into
apostasy in the third and fourth centuries, it has not been recognizing these offices,
and erroneous cessation theories purporting that the apostolic and prophetic offices
ceased with the death of the Apostles of the Lamb have been prevalent, especially in
mainline denominational doctrine. And then, somewhere along the line, primarily, as I
said, within the last hundred years or so, local churches began calling the chief minister
"the pastor," even though that office, according to Scripture, does not entail
government, per se.
But, the Scriptural pattern is that there is
a "set man" (Num. 27:15-23) whom God recognizes and has appointed as
the chief leader or elder in a local church. Functionally, this person is actually a
"local apostle," according to the Scriptural pattern, and should
possess and demonstrate the giftings or anointing of an apostle, which are the
entire range of the Fivefold Ministry offices. This man is esteemed by the other
elders as a "chief among equals," as was Peter among the Twelve, as was
James in the Jerusalem Church and as the presiding elder at the
Jerusalem Council (Ac. 15), as was John over the churches of Asia Minor in the latter
part of his ministry, and as was Paul over the churches he founded, or to whom he
became the spiritual father, for example.
However, "Apostolic Authority" is intrinsically
parochial; that is to say, limited, to the particular local church(es) where God
has established the apostle relationally—usually churches which they
have had a part in founding, or existing churches that voluntarily have placed
themselves under the leadership of an apostle who has become a "spiritual father"
to those people and its leadership. Thus, "Apostolic Authority" is decidedly not
some sort of automatic universal authority inuring to an apostle by virtue of the
title of apostle. Morever, legitimate "Apostolic Authority" is never
organizational, but rather is always relational. And it is vital
to remember that all relationships among Fivefold Ministers are horizontal,
not vertical. All Fivefold Ministers are peers with different functions, giftings,
anointings, and callings. None is more important than another, or superior or
inferior to another.
The church is the family extended and the family is the church in miniscule;
thus, the principles of governance are the same for both (cf, Eph. 5:22-33).
The family has ONE head — the husband/father (male). While a man is the
husband/father of his OWN HOUSEHOLD, his authority is limited to that one
household; his title/office of husband/father does not mean that he is the
husband/father of any other household, and indeed he would be a trespasser and
unlawful intruder if he tried to assert his husband/father authority over any
other household. In fact, God's Word expressly addressed that scenario through
the writings of the Apostle Paul, dealing with the unlawful actions of deceived
deceivers who were attempting to do that very thing in the Early Church:
For among them are those who worm
their way into homes {households, NAS} and captivate silly and weak-natured and
spiritually-dwarfed women, loaded down with [the burden of their] sins, [and easily]
swayed and led away by various evil desires and seductive impulses.
(2 Tim. 3:6; AB)
So, in the circumstance today in the local
churches, regardless of what term is used to refer to him, the local church has a
"set man" who presides as the chief leader, rightly so, because he has been
so anointed and "set in" to that place of authority by God. Government
and leadership of the local church is not a matter of titles, ascendancy, and authority,
but of function, servitude, and esteem. When multiple Fivefold ministers are
laboring together to provide pilotage (leadership) to a local church, the proper
Spirit-inspired attitude should be to regard one another as co-equals ministerially
and functionally, though there is one among them who is esteemed as being the "leader
of the leaders," a la James in Jerusalem. Their goal as leaders should be to ascertain
the "consensus of the Spirit"; in other words, to reach unanimity based on what the
Spirit is speaking to them individually yet collectively. "It seemed good to us and
to the Holy Spirit...." "WE have the mind of Christ." Christ reveals His full
"mind," counsel, to a plurality of elders, not a solitary leader. The notion that
God speaks the entire vision and direction for a church to a single "vision-holder"
is nonsense, unbiblical, and the height of hubris. I wouldn't follow someone across
the street who said he had no need for the counsel and consensus of other leaders.
Apostleship is anything but autocracy.
Governmental AUTHORITY is limited to the role of leadership of the
local church, and is not personal authority (i.e., authority over people),
but authority to provide spiritual impartation as well as "pilotage" to
the church and its affairs. Beyond the local church, there is no "authority"
among ministers — Jesus told the apostles they were "all on the same level as
brothers" (Mat. 23:8, LB), meaning they were co-equals. Thus, there is no ascending
authority structure, or rank system, or "chain-of-command" among Fivefold Ministers,
that is to say, no one of the ministry offices has authority or ascendancy over
another, as purported by the erroneous concept of "positional authority.")
In other words, the premise is not that apostles are over prophets, prophets
over evangelists, and so on, as if there were "rank" inherent in the the
Fivefold Ministry Offices. That's just not the way it works.
Though, clearly, as mentioned earlier, there is a preeminence
among the Fivefold Ministry Gifts in terms of FUNCTION and ROLE —
its governmental role, in particular. Governmentally and functionally speaking, the
apostolic function is first, or preeminent, followed by the prophetic,
and then the teaching function (1 Cor. 12:28). Among those functioning in the Fivefold
Ministry offices, there is to be no envy, competition, or jockeying for position, but a
faithful and willing subjection to the Scripturally-revealed Kingdom order. The commanders
of God’s Army understand authority, march in line, do not deviate from their assigned
lanes of function, and do not break ranks (Joel 2:7,8).
Nevertheless, there is, however, a deference, among Fivefold Ministers
that is based entirely on earned ESTEEM, not any perceived or ostensible
"authority." Such esteem and deference toward proven and attested senior
ministers, wherein believers, including ministers, esteem highly certain
other ministers for the spiritual giftings, wisdom, leadership acumen, they
demonstrate, is proper, appropriate, and Scriptural:
"But we request of you brethren,
that you appreciate those who diligently labor among you, and have charge over you
in the Lord and give you instruction (lit., admonition, warning, correction)
and that you ESTEEM THEM HIGHLY IN LOVE because of their
work."
I hope this helps somewhat to answer
your questions.
Print Friendly
Version of this article in PDF
Related articles you may want to read:
The Fivefold Mandate in 2005
The Invalidity of the Office of "Bishop"
The Myth of Spiritual Covering
The Signs of Spiritual Abuse
What Is Hyper-authoritarianism
Charismatic Captivation
The Fallacy of Personal Pastors
|